Allāhu Akbar and the Journey to God: Escaping the Distractions of the Surface

“Allāhu akbar” is not a statement of comparison — it ranks God neither among objects nor among gods. The weight of the sentence falls on confession: our perspective is local, we cannot see the truth from the global vantage, and therefore God is greater than the God of our own perception. Al-Anʿām 103 says exactly this: sight cannot encompass Him, while He encompasses sight. Bediüzzaman's phrase the known-unknown and the step of ascent described in the Sixteenth Word meet at the same point — every takbīr in the prayer is a rung climbed from the particulars to the universal circles. Al-ʿAnkabūt 45's the remembrance of God is greater then translates this into a hierarchy of attention. The piece closes with the image of a dive into the sea of meaning: as one descends, names and objects dissolve and representatives remain, until at the Lote Tree of the Farthest Boundary only the Muhammadan reality is left. As objects lose their weight, acts remain.

Tefekkür
All Essays
Cognition & Consciousness

Allāhu Akbar and the Journey to God: Escaping the Distractions of the Surface

“Allāhu akbar” is not a statement of comparison — it ranks God neither among objects nor among gods. The weight of the sentence falls on confession: our perspective is local, we cannot see the truth from the global vantage, and therefore God is greater than the God of our own perception. Al-Anʿām 103 says exactly this: sight cannot encompass Him, while He encompasses sight. Bediüzzaman's phrase the known-unknown and the step of ascent described in the Sixteenth Word meet at the same point — every takbīr in the prayer is a rung climbed from the particulars to the universal circles. Al-ʿAnkabūt 45's the remembrance of God is greater then translates this into a hierarchy of attention. The piece closes with the image of a dive into the sea of meaning: as one descends, names and objects dissolve and representatives remain, until at the Lote Tree of the Farthest Boundary only the Muhammadan reality is left. As objects lose their weight, acts remain.

Felsufi·6 min read·2024-10-22·View on Medium ↗

The text below is Felsufi's own essay in reading and reflection. It may carry approaches that differ from classical tafsīr — Sufi interpretation, synthesis with modern science, the Risale-i Nur perspective. Because it is the author's personal ijtihād, alternative classical readings exist; this text makes no claim to a single correct reading — it offers a perspective.

يٓا اَيُّهَا الْمُدَّثِّرُ قُمْ فَاَنْذِرْ وَرَبَّكَ فَـكَبِّرْ

74:1-3

“O you who are wrapped in a cloak, arise and warn! And magnify your Lord alone (rabbika fa-kabbir).” — One of the earliest commands of revelation is not a transfer of information but a training of posture: kabbir — magnify, proclaim His greatness.

It is not right to understand Allāhu akbar (God is greatest) as “God is the greatest when compared with all bodies, with everything we see and know.” A thing is compared with things of its own kind — and God has no kind. “God is the greatest among all the gods” does not sit properly either, for that reading presupposes a set of gods to enter the comparison.

Better by far is to remember that our perspective is local and to confess that we cannot see the truth from the global vantage point.

What “akbar” is and is not
The comparative reading
The reading that takes akbar as a ranking adjective: it is assumed to point at the largest member of a set.
“The greatest compared with all bodies” — but a thing is compared with its own kind
“The greatest among all gods” — but this presupposes a set of gods to be compared
In either case God is placed inside our own scale
What akbar addresses is not the degree of God's greatness but the limit of our own scale. The takbīr is therefore not a measurement but a sentence of surrender.
The confession of perspective
The reading that takes akbar as a declaration of the limit of our own scale: the subject of the sentence is God, its weight is our own comprehension.
God, having no alternative in His essence, possesses no kind to enter comparison
God is beyond, is greater than, the God within our own perception
The sentence carries not information but a confession: my perspective is local

لَا تُدْرِكُهُ الْاَبْصَارُ وَهُوَ يُدْرِكُ الْاَبْصَارَ وَهُوَ اللَّطِيفُ الْخَبِيرُ

6:103

“No human vision can encompass Him, whereas He encompasses all human vision: for He alone is unfathomable, all-aware.” — The verse is two-directional: the failure of comprehension to reach Him and His encompassing of comprehension stand in the same sentence.

Allāhu akbar may be read thus: since God has no alternative in His essence, He is beyond, and greater than, the God within our perception. In this sense it is to accept Him as the known-unknown, in the spirit of “We have not known You as You deserve to be known, O Known One.”

“Mā ʿarafnāka ḥaqqa maʿrifatika yā Maʿrūf”We have not known You as You deserve to be known, O Known One!

Klasik münâcât ifadesi
Why “the known-unknown” is the more accurate title
Bediüzzaman's distinction here is fine-grained: to look upon God under the title of the known and the recognised in fact produces a customary familiarity and an imitative hearing — an intimacy manufactured by habit. To look upon the same Essence under the title of the known-unknown (One whose existence is known, whose quiddity is not) opens the way to real knowledge. To know that you do not know is more knowledge than to know wrongly.

Know, O noble one! If you look upon Almighty God under the title of the known and the recognised, He becomes unknown and unacknowledged. For this “being known” is a customary familiarity, an imitative hearing; it is not an expression that can proclaim the reality. Moreover, the meaning that arrives at the understanding through that title cannot carry the absolute attributes together and cast them into the mind. It is merely a sort of title for contemplating the Most Holy Essence. But if Almighty God is regarded under the title of the known-unknown, the rays of His being known emerge to a degree.

Bediüzzaman — Mesnevî-i Nûriye, Habbe

In the Prayer, Every Takbīr Is a Rung

Projected onto our own world, on the other hand, the remembrance of God can be compared from several angles. In the Sixteenth Word, where he expounds the prayer, Bediüzzaman describes how by saying Allāhu akbar in the movements of the prayer we traverse degrees. And we do so by confessing that we stand among particulars — that our own perception remains at the local perspective; one ascends to the universal circles, to the global perspective, only by the confession that “He is greater than what we know of Him.”

The degrees ascended by takbīr
TRIGGER
The particulars
The starting state: comprehension is at the local perspective, among individual objects.
STATE
“Allāhu akbar”
A confession is uttered: He is greater than what I know. This adds no information — it declares the limit.
STATE
Traversing the degrees
Each takbīr is a rung of the ascent; spiritual progress is traversed by these rungs.
OUTCOME
The universal circles
The arrival: the global perspective. In this aspect the prayer is an ascension.

It is as though repeatedly saying “Allāhu akbar, Allāhu akbar” in the movements of the prayer is a sign of traversing degrees and of spiritual progress, and of rising from the particulars to the universal circles; and it is a summary title for the perfections of His grandeur that lie beyond our knowledge. As if each “Allāhu akbar” signals the traversing of one rung of the ascent.

Bediüzzaman — Sözler, On Altıncı Söz, Dördüncü Şuâ

In this aspect the prayer is an ascension, and the servant's greatest, most important item of business at any given moment is to establish the prayer of the time he is in. One meaning of Allāhu akbar is therefore the remembrance of God is greater: that God be remembered, that He be made the agenda, is the greatest matter. It carries the sense that remembering God is a greater work than remembering anything else, and more important.

اُتْلُ مٓا اُوحِيَ اِلَيْكَ مِنَ الْكِتَابِ وَاَقِمِ الصَّلٰوةَ اِنَّ الصَّلٰوةَ تَنْهٰى عَنِ الْفَحْشٓاءِ وَالْمُنْكَرِ وَلَذِكْرُ اللّٰهِ اَكْبَرُ وَاللّٰهُ يَعْلَمُ مَا تَصْنَعُونَ

29:45

“Recite what has been revealed to you of the Book and establish the prayer. Truly the prayer restrains from indecency (faḥshāʾ) and wrong. And the remembrance of God is greater still (wa la-dhikru'llāhi akbar). And God knows what you do.” — That is: among a person's items of business, the remembrance of God must stand at the very top.

Two faces of the same root: akbar
Allāhu akbar
The ontological face: that God is greater than my conception of Him.
Addresses: the limit of comprehension
The state it produces: impotence and surrender
The lā tudrikuhu'l-abṣār of al-Anʿām 103
The two faces are not separate: to the degree that I confess Him greater than what I know, remembering Him rises to the top of my concerns.
Dhikru'llāhi akbar
The practical face: that the remembrance of God stands highest among our concerns.
Addresses: the hierarchy of attention
The state it produces: awareness of standing in His presence
The wa la-dhikru'llāhi akbar of al-ʿAnkabūt 45

Within this understanding and this feeling, by means of the Allāhu akbars of the prayer we notice the worldly memories, images or inner voices that keep arriving, and by suggesting to ourselves “right now I must focus on God, for He is the most important and the only important thing,” we bring mind and heart to the awareness of standing in God's presence. This is at once a growth of the person in consciousness and awareness, and an exercise in not being pinned to the local perspective under the pressure of events and afflictions and the summons of sins and worldliness — an exercise in passing beyond matter to the global perspective.

Diving Deep in the Sea of Meaning

Realities do not lie where what we see is partitioned into objects by names. To name the many leaves of a tree one by one, to posit each as a separate entity, and thereby to lose sight of the tree's spirit of unity, cannot grasp reality. As one dives deeper into the sea of meaning, there remains a state in which names, classifications and objects slowly vanish, and what appears behind them are the nameless shared functions that produce and create them.

Three images of the descent
As distance grows, what is seen one by one is erased
The crowd
At the surface it feels as though there were hundreds of people, hundreds of worlds
A layer or two down most of them become invisible; perhaps one or two remain
For one who cannot dive, the crowd at the surface is distraction
The rocket
As one leaves the earth, people appear like ants
Past a certain distance they become invisible
Wide-angle time
To look along the timeline so as to see thousands of years before and after
Individuals begin to lose their weight — yet some are still visible
Surface and depth
The surface — the life of this world
The layer where names and objects appear as multiplicity.
Hundreds of faces, the sense of hundreds of separate worlds
“A deceptive commodity” — attention scatters among partitioned objects
For one who does not know how to dive beneath the water, the hundreds of people seen at the surface are a distraction. The life of this world is just such a deceptive commodity.
The depth — the hereafter
The layer where the nameless shared functions producing the objects appear.
The hereafter lies beneath this water — not at the surface
Names are erased; the tree's spirit of unity appears

Yet some persons and things at the surface may still appear as individuals down in the depth. These are the persons and things that matter from the standpoint of divinity. First many things vanish and the name of their kind remains. If a thing stands at the level of representing its own kind, its kind is then seen through it.

What remains in the depth: representation
The measure here is not magnitude but capacity to represent. If a person too deepens through God-consciousness, he acquires a name at greater depths as well; he becomes the representative of many things and people at the surface. One whose aspiration is his nation is, alone, a nation. This shares an axis with the discussion of the Generous and ontological priority on this site: beings come first to the degree that they represent their own kind.
What remains as the descent continues
TRIGGER
Things vanish
Names and classifications are erased; objects lose their one-by-one visibility.
STATE
The name of the kind remains
Instead of individual leaves, the tree; instead of individual members, the name of the species.
STATE
The representative remains
The individual at the level of representing his kind displays that kind through himself.
STATE
Handover to a higher representative
Past a certain point he too vanishes, and a representative at a higher level remains in view.
OUTCOME
The Lote Tree of the Farthest Boundary
At the end there remains the first-created light, the Muhammadan reality; that light alone may come before the Necessarily Existent — at the distance of two bow-lengths or nearer.

And so, with the intention that the remembrance of God is greatest, one dives deep into that water saying Allāhu akbar, again and again. For while the greatness of God's remembrance is being recalled, nothing else retains its importance. Only His remembrance remains: only He is sought, only He is seen, known, heard. The one who seeks and the one sought, the one who sees and the one seen, become He.

As objects lose their weight, acts remain. Agent and object, place and time are no longer separate things; they become a property of that act, of that process. Allāhu akbar shines upon the tower of the word of unity.

Felsufi
About this text
The Turkish is the author's own pen; the English is a translation. The three scriptural anchors of the piece — al-Muddaththir 74:1-3, al-Anʿām 6:103 and al-ʿAnkabūt 29:45 — are taken directly from the verse graph on this site, with the Uthmani orthography normalised for display. The Bediüzzaman citations are from al-Mathnawī al-Nūrī (Habbe) and The Words (Sixteenth Word, Fourth Ray).
With Gratitude to the Author

This essay appears on QuranCodex with the verbal permission and generosity of Felsufi. All interpretations and syntheses reflect the author's personal reflection; QuranCodex carries these texts respectfully as an invitation to think. The original text is published on Medium.